Judge Frees 2 of 5 Suspects in Ensenada Homicide Coordinator Murder

0
4

A Baja California judge freed two of five suspects arrested for the April 24 murder of Ángel Pantoja Pantoja, the state prosecutor’s office homicide coordinator in Ensenada. The ruling, handed down on Saturday, May 23, prompted State Attorney General María Elena Andrade Ramírez to publicly blast the decision as “a judicial blunder” during a press conference at the FGE (Baja California’s state attorney general’s office) headquarters in Tijuana on Tuesday, May 26.

Three suspects remain in custody. They face charges of premeditated homicide with treachery and criminal association. The two released suspects have not been acquitted, Andrade clarified. The FGE holds two separate investigation files against them for other crimes, and she vowed to continue the legal fight.

“They killed our colleague and they have to pay for what they did,” Andrade said. She described the group as “a criminal organization with a very high profile” and warned that dangerous individuals are now back on the street.

Advertise with Baja Daily News

Pantoja’s Bodyguards Were Pulled One Day Before the Killing

Pantoja, 45, was shot multiple times while driving an official vehicle in the Villas Residencial del Rey neighborhood of Ensenada on the morning of April 24. The attackers’ vehicle was found shortly afterward. But the assassination did not come without warning.

In January 2026, Pantoja received direct threats during an FGE operation to arrest an Ensenada municipal police officer accused of forced disappearance. During that operation, the officer’s son was killed. The threats against Pantoja followed.

The FGE assigned bodyguards to protect Pantoja after the January threats. Yet those bodyguards were withdrawn one day before his murder. Andrade has not publicly explained why the security detail was pulled. Reporting from Punto Norte revealed that the same pattern occurred with another FGE official, a subcommander who was also executed after losing assigned escorts.

This detail is the most troubling element of the case. A prosecutor who investigates homicides, who was known to be threatened by organized crime, was left without protection by his own institution 24 hours before he was killed. Whether the withdrawal was bureaucratic negligence or something worse, the FGE has offered no public accounting.

Ensenada Homicide Coordinator Murder Linked to His Caseload

Andrade told reporters that the FGE has evidence linking the murder directly to the investigative work Pantoja performed inside the office. She said the five detained suspects are connected to cases Pantoja was actively pursuing.

Pantoja served as coordinator of the Unidad de Homicidios Dolosos, the intentional homicide unit responsible for investigating murders across the Ensenada municipality. That role placed him at the center of the most dangerous cases in a city that has seen sustained cartel violence for years. Ensenada recorded more than 200 homicides in 2025, and the first months of 2026 have shown no clear decline.

The judge who released the two suspects ruled that prosecutors had not presented sufficient evidence to bind them over for trial, a standard known in Mexico’s accusatorial justice system as vinculación a proceso. This is not a verdict of innocence. It means the judge found the FGE’s evidence package incomplete at this stage. Prosecutors can still refile charges with stronger evidence.

Andrade pushed back forcefully: “The attorney general’s office disagrees with that judicial determination. We believe there are sufficient elements to obtain the binding order.” She added that the FGE will “fight with everything” to keep the case moving forward.

Prosecutor and Judiciary Clash Over Case Standards

The public confrontation between Andrade and the judiciary is notable in itself. Mexico’s 2008 criminal justice reform created the accusatorial system that requires prosecutors to present sufficient evidence at binding hearings before a judge of control. Judges regularly reject weak cases, and prosecutors regularly complain about the standard.

But this case involves the murder of one of the FGE’s own senior officials. The attorney general’s willingness to publicly call a judge’s ruling a “blunder” at a televised press conference raises the stakes on both sides. If the FGE cannot secure convictions in the assassination of its homicide chief, it sends a message about the office’s capacity to prosecute organized crime at any level.

For anyone living in or visiting Ensenada, the case lays bare two institutional failures operating at once. The first is a protection failure: a threatened law enforcement official stripped of security and then killed. The second is a prosecution failure: arrests made, but evidence packages that a judge found insufficient for two of five suspects.

The three suspects who remain in custody face a continued legal process. The FGE has signaled it will seek new binding orders against the two released individuals using its open investigation files. Andrade did not provide a timeline for those filings. The original reporting is from Punto Norte.